Tuesday, 10 May 2011

IPv6 over MPLS (6PE)

There are multiple ways to tunnel IPv6 over IPv4 based networks, however if tunnelling using tuneling interfaces such as used in GRE tunnels for whatever reason is not allowed, one method is to tunnel IPv6 over MPLS

In this example, R6 will be an IPv4 only router (MPLS P Router) that with R5 and R7 acting as IPv6 PEs (though for the base routing instance, not IPv6 VPNs)


Topology Description

                R4========R5========R6========R7=========R8
Layer 2            Ethernet Ethernet  Ethernet   HDLC
Layer 2.5                     MPLS      MPLS
Layer 3              IPv6     IPv4      IPv4     IPv6
Routing Protocol    OSPFv3   MP-BGP    MP-BGP  IPv6EIGRP


Router Configurations

Routers are 3725s emulated in dynamips

R8#sh ver | I IOS
Cisco IOS Software, 3700 Software (C3725-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(15)T14, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)


R4 is running OSPFv3 process 1 and has Loopback0 directly in OSPF process 1 (if instead of this Loopback 0 was redistributed into OSPF and therefore was shown as an external route to OSPF, when R5 redistributes OSPF into the BGP IPv6 Unicast address-family, you would need to specific the "external" keyword)

I prefer to manualy set the link-local IP addresses on external interfaces

R4
hostname R4
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
interface Loopback0
no ip address
ipv6 address FEC0::4/128
ipv6 ospf 1 area 0
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description R5 Fa0/1
no ip address
ipv6 address FE80::4 link-local
ipv6 address FEC0:45::4/64
ipv6 ospf 1 area 0
!
ipv6 router ospf 1
router-id 4.4.4.4
log-adjacency-changes
passive-interface Loopback0


R5 is running OSPFv3 with R4 and OSPFv2 with R6. MPLS is enabled between R5 and R6 with R5 a route-reflector client of R6

R5
hostname R5
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
interface Loopback0
ip address 5.5.5.5 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description R6 Fa0/1
ip address 192.168.56.5 255.255.255.0
mpls ip
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
description R4 Fa0/0
no ip address
ipv6 address FE80::5 link-local
ipv6 address FEC0:45::5/64
ipv6 ospf 1 area 0
!
router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes
network 5.5.5.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 192.168.56.5 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
router bgp 64512
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 64512
neighbor 6.6.6.6 password secret
neighbor 6.6.6.6 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv6
neighbor 6.6.6.6 activate
neighbor 6.6.6.6 send-label
redistribute ospf 1 metric 100 include-connected
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
ipv6 router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute bgp 64512 metric 100
!


R6 is running OSPFv2 with R5 and R7. MPLS is enabled on R5 and R7 facing interfaces and R6 is a route-reflector and using peer-group configuration. There is no IPv6 link configuration on R6, only the MP-BGP IPv6 unicast address family definition (which requires us to enable ipv6 unicast-routing to be able to configure)

R6
hostname R6
ip cef
ipv6 unicast-routing
interface Loopback0
ip address 6.6.6.6 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description R7 Fa01/0
ip address 192.168.67.6 255.255.255.0
mpls ip
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.56.6 255.255.255.0
mpls ip
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 6.6.6.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 192.168.56.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 192.168.67.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
router bgp 64512
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor RR-client peer-group
neighbor RR-client remote-as 64512
neighbor RR-client password secret
neighbor RR-client update-source Loopback0
neighbor 5.5.5.5 peer-group RR-client
neighbor 7.7.7.7 peer-group RR-client
!
address-family ipv6
neighbor RR-client route-reflector-client
neighbor RR-client send-label
neighbor 5.5.5.5 activate
neighbor 7.7.7.7 activate
exit-address-family
!

R7 is running IPv6 EIGRP with R8 and OSPFv2 with R6. MPLS is enabled between R7 and R6 with R7 a route-reflector client of R6

R7
hostname R7
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
interface Loopback0
ip address 7.7.7.7 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
description R6 Fa0/0
ip address 192.168.67.7 255.255.255.0
mpls ip
!
interface Serial1/0
description R8 S1/0
no ip address
ipv6 address FE80::7 link-local
ipv6 address FEC0:78::7/64
ipv6 eigrp 100
clock rate 2016000
!
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 7.7.7.7 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 192.168.67.7 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
router bgp 64512
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 6.6.6.6 remote-as 64512
neighbor 6.6.6.6 password secret
neighbor 6.6.6.6 update-source Loopback0
!
address-family ipv6
neighbor 6.6.6.6 activate
neighbor 6.6.6.6 send-label
redistribute connected metric 100
redistribute eigrp 100 metric 100
no synchronization
exit-address-family
!
ipv6 router eigrp 100
no shutdown
redistribute bgp 64512 metric 100000 1 1 1 1500
!

R8 is running IPv6 EIGRP and has Loopback0 redistributed into it

R8
hostname R8
ipv6 unicast-routing
ipv6 cef
interface Loopback0
no ip address
ipv6 address FEC0::8/128
!
interface Serial1/0
description R7 S1/0
no ip address
ipv6 address FE80::8 link-local
ipv6 address FEC0:78::8/64
ipv6 eigrp 100
!
ipv6 router eigrp 100
eigrp router-id 8.8.8.8
no shutdown
redistribute connected


Lets look on our IPv6 routers and see if the routes to the other side can be seen:

R4#sh ipv6 route ospf
IPv6 Routing Table - Default - 6 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static route
B - BGP, M - MIPv6, R - RIP, I1 - ISIS L1
I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary, D - EIGRP
EX - EIGRP external
O - OSPF Intra, OI - OSPF Inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2
OE2 FEC0::8/128 [110/100]
via FE80::5, FastEthernet0/0
OE2 FEC0:78::/64 [110/100]
via FE80::5, FastEthernet0/0


R8#sh ipv6 route eigrp
IPv6 Routing Table - Default - 6 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, U - Per-user Static route
B - BGP, M - MIPv6, R - RIP, I1 - ISIS L1
I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea, IS - ISIS summary, D - EIGRP
EX - EIGRP external
O - OSPF Intra, OI - OSPF Inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
ON1 - OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 - OSPF NSSA ext 2
EX FEC0::4/128 [170/2170112]
via FE80::7, Serial1/0
EX FEC0:45::/64 [170/2170112]
via FE80::7, Serial1/0

Okay, very promising - Lets see if R4 Lo0 can reach R8 Lo0

R4#ping fec0::8 source fec0::4 repeat 20

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 20, 100-byte ICMP Echos to FEC0::8, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of FEC0::4
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (20/20), round-trip min/avg/max = 16/21/36 ms


No problem here. So how does this work?

Lets see if we see the IPv6 routes on the route-reflector

R6#sh ip bgp ipv6 unicast summary
BGP router identifier 6.6.6.6, local AS number 64512
BGP table version is 9, main routing table version 9
4 network entries using 624 bytes of memory
4 path entries using 304 bytes of memory
2/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 336 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
Bitfield cache entries: current 1 (at peak 1) using 32 bytes of memory
BGP using 1296 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 15/11 prefixes, 18/14 paths, scan interval 60 secs

Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
5.5.5.5 4 64512 127 127 9 0 0 00:00:20 2
7.7.7.7 4 64512 114 119 9 0 0 00:00:08 2

Well we can see that we've learnt 2 prefixes from each of the PEs

R6#sh ip bgp ipv6 unicast | begin Network
*>iFEC0::4/128      ::FFFF:5.5.5.5         100    100      0 ?
*>iFEC0::8/128      ::FFFF:7.7.7.7         100    100      0 ?
*>iFEC0:45::/64     ::FFFF:5.5.5.5         100    100      0 ?
*>iFEC0:78::/64     ::FFFF:7.7.7.7         100    100      0 ?
Lets look at R6's MPLS label table to see if we can see anything related to IPv6

R6#show mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     Pop Label     7.7.7.7/32        0             Fa0/0      192.168.67.7
17     Pop Label     5.5.5.5/32        0             Fa0/1      192.168.56.5
Not directly in the forwarding path, however there are labels associated with the IPv6 routes themselves used by the PEs to identify routes:

R6#sh ip bgp ipv6 unicast labels
Network Next Hop In label/Out label
FEC0::4/128 ::FFFF:5.5.5.5 nolabel/20
FEC0::8/128 ::FFFF:7.7.7.7 nolabel/21
FEC0:45::/64 ::FFFF:5.5.5.5 nolabel/19
FEC0:78::/64 ::FFFF:7.7.7.7 nolabel/19

Okay, Lets lets go to each of the PEs and see the associated Labels


R5#sh mpls forwarding-table
   Network          Next Hop      In label/Out label
   FEC0::4/128      ::FFFF:5.5.5.5  nolabel/20
   FEC0::8/128      ::FFFF:7.7.7.7  nolabel/21
   FEC0:45::/64     ::FFFF:5.5.5.5  nolabel/19
   FEC0:78::/64     ::FFFF:7.7.7.7  nolabel/19

R7#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     16            7.7.7.7/32        0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
17     Pop Label     6.6.6.6/32        0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
18     Pop Label     192.168.67.0/24   0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
19     No Label      FEC0:45::/64      0             aggregate
20     No Label      FEC0::4/128       2280          Fa0/1      FE80::4

We'll clear the MPLS related counters and send 1000 packets between the two endpoints to see which MPLS paths we're using - first we'll clear the associated counters.


R5#clear mpls counters
Clear "show mpls forwarding-table" counters [confirm]
R6#clear mpls counters
Clear "show mpls forwarding-table" counters [confirm]
R6#clear mpls counters
Clear "show mpls forwarding-table" counters [confirm]


R4#ping fec0::8 source fec0::4 repeat 1000

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 1000, 100-byte ICMP Echos to FEC0::8, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of FEC0::4
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/25/72 ms


Lets look at the forwarding-tables again to see the bytes switched values...

R5#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     16            7.7.7.7/32        0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
17     Pop Label     6.6.6.6/32        0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
18     Pop Label     192.168.67.0/24   0             Fa0/0      192.168.56.6
19     No Label      FEC0:45::/64      0             aggregate
20     No Label      FEC0::4/128       114000        Fa0/1      FE80::4

Ok, so traffic coming into R5 with a label of 20 is going through to FE80::4 (R4 Lo0)


R6#show mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     Pop Label     7.7.7.7/32        118000        Fa0/0      192.168.67.7
17     Pop Label     5.5.5.5/32        118000        Fa0/1      192.168.56.5


We can see traffic destined to each of the PEs

R7#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     Pop Label     6.6.6.6/32        0             Fa0/1      192.168.67.6
17     Pop Label     192.168.56.0/24   0             Fa0/1      192.168.67.6
18     17            5.5.5.5/32        0             Fa0/1      192.168.67.6
19     No Label      FEC0:78::/64      0             aggregate
21     No Label      FEC0::8/128       104000        Se1/0      point2point

We can see traffic coming into R7 with a label of 21 is destined to FE80::8 (R8 Lo)


So if we trace the path from R4 to R8:

R4#trace
Protocol [ip]: ipv6
Target IPv6 address: fec0::8
Source address: fec0::4
Insert source routing header? [no]:
Numeric display? [no]:
Timeout in seconds [3]:
Probe count [3]:
Minimum Time to Live [1]:
Maximum Time to Live [30]:
Priority [0]:
Port Number [0]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to FEC0::8

  1 FEC0:45::5 28 msec 32 msec 16 msec
  2 ::FFFF:192.168.56.6 [MPLS: Labels 16/21 Exp 0] 20 msec 28 msec 28 msec
  3 FEC0:78::7 [MPLS: Label 21 Exp 0] 32 msec 28 msec 16 msec
  4 FEC0:78::8 28 msec 32 msec 16 msec

We can see on entry #2 that R6 is using label 16 to get to R7 and inner label 21 will be used to tell R7 this is destined for FEC0::8/128
On entry #3 we can see that R7 is using label 21 to determine we send traffic out S1/0 to reach R8


Tracing in the reverse direction?

R8#trace
Protocol [ip]: ipv6
Target IPv6 address: fec0::4
Source address: fec0::8
Insert source routing header? [no]:
Numeric display? [no]:
Timeout in seconds [3]:
Probe count [3]:
Minimum Time to Live [1]:
Maximum Time to Live [30]:
Priority [0]:
Port Number [0]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to FEC0::4

  1 FEC0:78::7 76 msec 136 msec 28 msec
  2 ::FFFF:192.168.67.6 [MPLS: Labels 17/20 Exp 0] 88 msec 120 msec 72 msec
  3 FEC0:45::5 [MPLS: Label 20 Exp 0] 116 msec 100 msec 116 msec
  4 FEC0:45::4 88 msec 116 msec 96 msec

We can see on entry #2 that R6 is using label 17 to get to R5 and inner label 20 will be used to tell R5 this is destined for FEC0::4/128
On entry #3 we can see that R5 is using label 20 to determine we send traffic out Fa0/1 to reach R4

2 comments:

  1. This post's good, mates! I can see two of difficult things here, mpls and IPv6.
    Are you CCIE SP? gussing from you experience,,,
    I'm studying for SP myself nowdays.
    I think I can learn lots of knowledge from this blog. Ta!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Logan - I'm working my way to get a CCIE in the Routing and Switching track although Service Provider is more of my background - this specific example may not be directly relevant to R&S but was fun to set up and see how it works. Glad to be of some help.

    ReplyDelete